DAD.info
Forum - Ask questions. Get answers.
Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:

Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.

Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.

If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help

Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Have I shot myself in the foot?

 
(@Ironman08)
Trusted Member Registered

Wife has prohibited steps and child arrangement order against me (i'm appealing). My wife moved 10 miles away (and then has quietly moved twice since without a word as to where until i keep finding out) to be closer to work.

I have filed a prohibited steps against my mother in law to have no contact with the children due to threats of violence, constant abusive language around the children and risks over child welfare. Police have been involved 4 times and even came to have 45 mins chatting directly to the children yesterday during supervised visit to subtly get their take on things and so they also become familiar and comfortable with the police.

And for the record no this is not to get my wife but solely for the protection of my children.

However MIL is my wife's sole way of getting my children to their schools 10 miles away as she doesn't drive, if she puts it in front of a judge what is the likelihood a judge will force a school move 10 miles from me as that is what she wants?

My understanding is the CAO and PS is only a temporary measure until court decides what is true in my wife's statement (about 1%) and then makes a permanent arrangement based on the directions hearing and Cafcass.

I'm worried by having filed this it gives my wife a silver bullet to force through a move.

Quote
Topic starter Posted : 25/11/2018 11:42 pm
 Mojo
(@Mojo)
Illustrious Member Registered

It’s really difficult to judge what the outcome might be I’m afraid. It does seem that you may have delivered a fait accompli by trying to exclude the mother in law, as she is the only way the children have of getting to school.

It’s rare for a court to refuse a move, within the jurisdiction and they might view 10miles as acceptable... but we would all just be guessing right now... it’s a suck it and see I’m afraid.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 26/11/2018 12:49 am
 Yoda
(@yoda)
Famed Member

Agreed. Very difficult to guess a judge's decision in any case, but one where the distances aren't that great, is anyone's guess.

At the end of the day, if the MIL is a safeguarding issue, she's a safeguarding issue......

ReplyQuote
Posted : 26/11/2018 11:54 pm
(@Ironman08)
Trusted Member Registered

That is my argument entirely. Just hoping my argument is a strong one.

I really do think i'm overthinking it, but as with everyone else on here, your children are your world and you worry.

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 27/11/2018 8:32 pm
 Yoda
(@yoda)
Famed Member

You'll feel better when you've had the next hearing. The not knowing is the worst for making you second guess and over think!

ReplyQuote
Posted : 27/11/2018 10:06 pm
(@Ironman08)
Trusted Member Registered

Simple answer was the judge refused to make a judgement on either issue and passed them off to the directions hearing at the end of Feb.

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 03/12/2018 4:40 pm
Share:

Pin It on Pinterest