DAD.info
Forum - Ask questions. Get answers.
Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:

Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.

Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.

If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help

Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Section 7 report

Page 1 / 2
 
(@thelongroad)
Estimable Member Registered

Hi,

I had my section 7 report and it was disappointing. They have gone along with mothers lies in this case and have dis regarded mine and the school family worker. They have even spoke about school worker being under investigation for allowing my son to speak to me. My son said he wanted to see me every weekend again during call but my ex made trouble for family worker and got her in trouble-you couldn't make it up. Cafcass are going against an independent school worker as ex was angry my son had a voice and spoke to me. There is an NMO hearing which will be totally disproved and my sons wishes have been disregarded because of this and the school family worker, trying to be good has got herself in trouble-feels so wrong. I have lots of police disclosures proving ex made false allegations and admitted in 2010 to lieing and only wanting an injunction-all this in police disclosure. Another disclosure shows her spitting at me and damaging my car when my son was with me. There is no evidence of me doing anything to her but i have 4 disclosures against her but it seems to no avail.

I have a NMO hearing on 29th November and a directions hearing on 19th December. Unfortunately the NMO should have been before section 7 which would have put an end to baseless allegations but what can you do?..
I have always had my son for 8 years every weekend and one day a week. Cafcass have now advised i should get every other weekend and shared holidays and alternate Xmas/birthdays, etc..I had asked for more contact/residence due to mums drug use and son being involved with CIN only a year ago. However i should not have got less.
In a social services report last year i am assessed as protective factor and it is stated i have my son every weekend and one day a week. In section 7 report they say

Regarding spending time arrangements, I am mindful that Mr xxxx wishes for xxxx to live with him from Friday to Wednesday; however, I am not able to support this arrangement as there is no evidence to support this significant change in the arrangement. Furthermore, given xxxxx’s ambivalence towards spending time arrangements as he is conflicted and in a state of turmoil, I am concerned that if such arrangements were to be implemented at this stage, it is likely to perpetuate to ongoing conflict between the parties.

Can i challenge this factually as i have proof i had my son every weekend and one day a week? How do i challenge it as they do not put a timescale or procedure.

So disappointed and down-any thoughts would be really appreciated.

Quote
Topic starter Posted : 30/10/2018 2:03 am
(@thelongroad)
Estimable Member Registered

Hi,

Added to my questions about appeal process for factual inaccuracies in section 7 i have some others. Just as a footnote the cafcass officer is now discharged so i cannot even cross examine her in court. This is the family court.

1-my son said in a phone call from school which is recorded he wanted to see me every weekend as he had done for 8 years, Can i use this in court for final hearing-is it admissible?

2-My son was also on child protection register only last year, in 2016/2017 but Cafcass officer has not looked at those reports,(see below) Can i challenge this as the reports call me a protective factor and detail contact is every weekend plus one day a week. Surely they should have had access to most important & recent CIN reports rather than just dismissing them?

Both Miss xxxxx and Mr xxxx informed me that child was on the Child Protection Register in the past, as a result of Miss X’s drug use; however, this information is not included in the report from xxx Children’s Services.
Evidence

3-My son is being coerced and controlled(see below)but they hardly mention this..

I explored with child about spending time with father. Child informed me that he asked his mother to spend time with his father; however, his mother told him that ‘if he goes to spend time with his father, he can’t come back’. Child then reverted that he did not wish to see his father, as his father “dumped” him on his mother’s doorstep. As Child used the word “dumped” specifically twice, I explored his use of the word, Child informed me that his mother said that his father “dumped” him on the doorstep. Child informed me that he has witnessed his parents arguing and he was saddened by this.

Does anyone have any thoughts on contesting this report

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 30/10/2018 10:51 am
 CJH
(@cjh)
Trusted Member Registered

Sorry to hear all that. I had a very similar sort of Section 7 myself very recently in the respect that negative behaviour by the mother was all but ignored. The report instead focused on the 'good things' she had been doing, ie, attending courses, accessing help, going to get breathalised once a week and not having any alcohol in her system on those occasions (bravo indeed...).

Firstly I would say using the recorded evidence is not advisable. Reference the call by all means but you're opening a can of worms by even admitting you have a recording. Accusations of coaching, alienating, controlling, threatening, all sorts. I speak from experience.

Address relevant inaccuracies that pertain to your application in your position statement and say why they contradict facts but keep in mind to be brief and to the point. I'll work on the assumption that everything you point to as evidence is already in the courts possession.

"Coercive behaviour: The section 7 report has explored (one/many? you might have more than one) an occasion where my son has been coached to provide responses to questions from the social worker by his mother. I am concerned that there is a pattern of similar behaviour designed to undermine my role in my sons life and my relationship with him."

"Recommendation of contact going forward: I disagree with the recommendation the CAFCASS officer has made. I have had my son every weekend for 8 years prior to this case and was a protective factor during his involvement in a Child Protection plan last year owing to (insert issues); I have made this application for additional time with my son not only in line with what he has told me and the CAFCASS officer are his wishes, but in order to provide him with long term stability and to minimise the risk of further harm from his mothers (insert problems). I believe that any reduction in his time spent with me would be detrimental to his well-being and development and would place him at significant risk of harm."

These are just off the top of my head. Believe me when I tell you I fully understand the desire to pick apart every individual lie or inaccuracy and right every wrong, but do not get hung up on specifics. It may be a CAFCASS officers report, but you're at liberty to disagree with them. What I will say is it works a lot better if your interpretation of how things should be are supported somewhere official.

I wish you all the luck in the world.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 30/10/2018 4:51 pm
(@thelongroad)
Estimable Member Registered

Thank you for your response CJH, really helpful & insightful.

Much appreciated

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 30/10/2018 8:07 pm
 Yoda
(@yoda)
Famed Member

It sounds like a very difficult situation.

Why has the Cafcass officer been discharged? In what sense? Has she left her job?

The court should be directing the officer to attend the hearing to give evidence.

You will have an opportunity to challenge the report in the hearings in some form or another or you would not have had a fair hearing.

Do you have permission to file any evidence at this stage?

ReplyQuote
Posted : 31/10/2018 12:31 am
(@thelongroad)
Estimable Member Registered

Hi Yoda,

The court ordered that the cafcass officers work has finished once she makes report. They have said she does not need to attend court to give evidence-is this not normal? That is what she told me at my interview.

It seems i can write to Cafcass asap about any factual inaccuracies but anything after that will need to be with the judge.

I have sent loads of evidence as part of NMO hearing(which includes CIN reports) and it is all really supportive from police and social services. Somehow Cafcass have not got any information from CIN plan in 2016/2017 which details weekly contact and me as a protective factor reducing the risk of harm.

Some folks are saying i got a good report but i still am looking at 50% less than i had and son has missed every homework for the last 5 months. I had weekly contact for 8 years

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 31/10/2018 1:46 am
(@justdad)
Estimable Member Registered

If a report has been submitted to the Court, you have a right to question the author.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 31/10/2018 7:38 pm
(@thelongroad)
Estimable Member Registered

Thanks justdad

The next hearing is a directions hearing on 19th December.
Do you always get the opportunity to question the cafcass worker and if so is this done at a contested final hearing not directions hearing?

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 01/11/2018 12:30 am
(@justdad)
Estimable Member Registered

The correct way is for it to happen at a final hearing. You may find the Court don't ask CAFCASS to attend for directions but do so for the final,

Ultimately, any hearing is down to the judge - there is never any set format unless you get a jobsworth.

Make it known at the directions hearing that you wish to cross examine the CAFCASS FCA at the final.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 01/11/2018 4:26 pm
(@thelongroad)
Estimable Member Registered

Thank you justdad.

I will put it in a position statement as well bringing it up in court at directions hearing.

just need to get through NMO first...its like the grand national.

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 01/11/2018 4:46 pm
(@justdad)
Estimable Member Registered

Just don't give away too much in that position statement. The other side will work feverishly to counter any questions or arguments in there so it might be wise to just say you have questions you would like to ask.

Showing your hand too early can often be detrimental.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 01/11/2018 7:42 pm
 Mojo
(@Mojo)
Illustrious Member Registered

Keep your position statement brief, no more than a couple of pages, to give a little more detail about background, concerns and what you would like the court to do.

All the best

ReplyQuote
Posted : 02/11/2018 4:48 pm
Page 1 / 2
Share:

Pin It on Pinterest