DAD.info
Forum - Ask questions. Get answers.
Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:

Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.

Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.

If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help

Second final order
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Second final order

 
(@superprouddad)
Reputable Member Registered

I had a final order made in 2017 that was breached, applied for enforcement and a second final order was made in 2018.

My ex is now saying that parts of the 2017 order apply. Can someone point me to practice direction or case law that explicitly says a second final order supersedes the first ?

Thanks

Quote
Topic starter Posted : 04/04/2019 11:34 pm
(@chapter)
Trusted Member Registered

In my case, the new order superseded the previous one in the provisions which were included in both. In other words, the new ‘Term Time Wednesday’ order supersedes the previous Wednesday order. It also stated that an important provision of the previous final order was ‘discharged’. This was a provision which was not included in the new final order.

So, this suggests that if there was a provision in the first order which was not ‘updated’ in the new order, and importantly was not expressly ‘discharged’ in the new final order, then it seems it can still be said to be live.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 05/04/2019 10:56 am
 Mojo
(@Mojo)
Illustrious Member Registered

As far as I’m aware, a new order supersedes the previous one, but hopefully, it would be a simple matter to get written clarification from the court about this.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/04/2019 1:51 pm
Share:

Pin It on Pinterest