DAD.info
2 homes, one priority: your child - Join the free Parenting After Separation course
Forum - Ask questions. Get answers.
2 homes, one priority: your child - Join the free Parenting After Separation course
Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:

Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.

Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.

If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help

Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Primary Carer

Page 2 / 5

Posts: 11890
 actd
Registered
(@dadmod4)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago

To be honest, with the recommendations from the court, and with what has happened to your ex since (assuming the court are aware of this, and if not, I'd make them aware), I can't see why the court wouldn't follow the recommendations.

Reply
Posts: 8551
 Mojo
Registered
(@Mojo)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 12 years ago

I agree with actd. With the recent developments and the subsequent report/recommendations, it’s highly likely that the court will accept them.

Your ex could only appeal procedural errors made during the case, she can’t appeal against the courts decision.

Please do keep us updated and best of luck for next week.

All the best

Reply
Posts: 9
Registered
Topic starter
(@Jonesy79)
Active Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Hi,

I was back in court last week and my ex wife did not take kindly to the recommendation from SS’s that the children reside with me. She raised concerns about me being able to safeguard the children and the judge has now asked for both of us to file statements relating to issues we have regarding safeguarding. My ex was happy with shared residency but I said no because of the section 37 report and the details it containedand the recommendation they should live with me. Because of this the judge ordered the children to have a ‘guardian’ so the children’s voices can be heard. I have taken exception to this as it is quite clear that there is absolutely no reason the children are not safe with me and the report into my ex is pretty damning to say the least.
We now need to attend a session outlining a CIN meeting with SS’s (even though of the 6 points outlined in the CIN plan all 6 points relate to my ex) and we go back to court in 4 weeks time.

I have been representing myself up until this point but feel I need some legal representation now because myself and the social services thought that this should have been concluded by now.

I am slightly confused how it has got to this point and any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Reply
Posts: 2831
 Yoda
(@yoda)
Famed Member
Joined: 10 years ago

As the mother did not agree with the recommendations, she is entitled to have a fair hearing. If she had agreed, this wouldn't be necessary.

Don't take exception to a Guardian being appointed. This is nearly always a good thing as the children will have a voice in the proceedings that isn't yours or the mothers.

If you can afford representation, it's your choice whether to go down that route or not. Continuing to represent yourself is entirely do able, but I would advise getting some support to prepare for the final hearing and writing your statement.

Courts generally go with report recommendations unless there is a very good reason not to.

Reply
Posts: 9
Registered
Topic starter
(@Jonesy79)
Active Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Thankyou for your reply. Much appreciated.

I just want what’s best for the children and for my ex wife as she needs help in getting better. Just hope one day she realises this has been done with the best intentions.

Reply
Page 2 / 5
Share:

Pin It on Pinterest