Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
All
The following recent judgement K v K [2022] is an interesting read and provides a lot of clarification by Sir Andrew Macfarlane President of the Family Division.
Some key points are:
- FHDRA - should be used to determine the matters in dispute and whether non court dispute resolution can be used to remedy.
- Mediation - at every possible opportunity, it should be considered whether mediation would be better rather than court.
- Fact Finding Hearings - should only be held where the outcome determines/impacts child contact or welfare of the child and not to determine matters relating to the previous relationship.
- Allegations - only allegations relating to the welfare of child or child contact should be considered. Just because there have been allegations of domestic violence, this does not mean these have to be considered and fact finding hearings held. Eg if the father has been seeing the children unsupervised after separation, if the mother subsequently raises allegations of domestic violence that occurred during the relationship and stops contact, this does not mean a Finding of Fact Hearing is required.
- Relevance and Proportionality is important.
- Cafcass - the last word at the end makes an interesting read, in so far as how wide off the mark Cafcass were when summarising the original judgement in their final report.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/468.html
There are many aspects of this judgement and the commentary that can be used when self representing.
All the best.
I wonder if this judge is the civil cases judge or martial court judge?
From Memory , this info was released around May 2022 , I think ? .
It's clear and I know Courts are adhering to these "directions" - litigants in person may not understand it fully and if they don't present their position clearly regarding Sir McFarlane's guidance - it's got potential to backfire
Welcome to the DAD.info forum.
We don’t like to set ‘rules’, but to make sure that you and the other dads are kept safe, we have some requests. When engaging with the forum, please be aware of the following:
- The forum is not moderated 24 hours per day.
- Many of the moderators do so on a voluntary basis. Whilst they may be able to provide some guidance, advice or support, they may not be able to deal with specifics.
- We are not an emergency crisis service so if you or someone else is in immediate danger, please call emergency services.
- If you are concerned about the safety of a child, please click here to find the support you can get for them (link to new page)
- If you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123. They are open 24 hours a day, 7 days per week.
We hope you find this forum a supportive environment and thank you for joining us.