Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
Hi all,
Reading online, I came across this article in the law gazette referring to a draft bill that prevents cross examining of spouses when there are allegations of domestic abuse.
Is anyone familiar with this? I was wondering what would happen in the event that the Respondent does not have a barrister to conduct the cross examination?
Not something I am familiar with, but certainly does raise an interesting point. Not sure whether the court would be able to answer this if you rang them.
The article states that Judges can use their power to prevent the cross examination. I would like to think that there would have to be very serious allegations with some background (previous convictions etc) before the order preventing cross examination could be used.
I’ve not had much luck with contacting the courts. The call handlers can’t seem to offer anything beyond what’s written on their screens and the delay in correspondence at the court I’m dealing with is at 42 days at present
Here’s some further info, it’s not quite as cut and dried as it first seems, they can instruct a legal representative to take care of the cross examination, but with the cuts to Family law there may not be the funds to cover this adequately. Also, asking someone to come in just to ask the questions, without being given leave to understand the details of the case.
I would assume that the judge would take over cross examination, this is done now for litigants that are very nervous etc
Thanks for clearing that up Mojo.
It's interesting in reading the article that it's so heavily focused on what the bill doesn't provide for genuine victims of domestic violence.
The caveats are there to protect genuine victims of false allegations otherwise it would open the floodgates further for those who wish to misuse Non Mols and PSOs.
It’s good to get different perspectives, it allows for a more balanced view. I would say though that the number of perpetrators that bully their victims in family court, in the way that is mentioned, is very small... most judges have control of their courtroom.
Far from clearing it up, I’ve muddied the waters! The two links I provided were in response to the original draft bill, which was dropped when the Government called a GE.
There is now a new consultation/draft bill which is what you linked to in your initial post.
It hasn’t yet become law, it has to pass through the legislature/both houses, here’s the summary of the draft bill that you first bought up.
I can only apologise... good job I double checked, which I did because I was bothered that the links I offered were quite old... so went looking again. Phew... sorry again!
Welcome to the DAD.info forum.
We don’t like to set ‘rules’, but to make sure that you and the other dads are kept safe, we have some requests. When engaging with the forum, please be aware of the following:
- The forum is not moderated 24 hours per day.
- Many of the moderators do so on a voluntary basis. Whilst they may be able to provide some guidance, advice or support, they may not be able to deal with specifics.
- We are not an emergency crisis service so if you or someone else is in immediate danger, please call emergency services.
- If you are concerned about the safety of a child, please click here to find the support you can get for them (link to new page)
- If you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123. They are open 24 hours a day, 7 days per week.
We hope you find this forum a supportive environment and thank you for joining us.