clarify wording on this p.s.o please ?

As it stands you have an order that states when he is in your care, the PSO just prevents him being removed from your care during the period defined in the originally order.

I actually think it's something that is poorly worded and potentially rushed due to the circumstances and the mother is using the grey area to her advantage.. 

ok i understand, so it just defeats the objective of a pso then really and pointless, i have emailed courts for clarity from judge

...so it states, he cant be removed from my care or school except the times  when he lives with mum which is 70% of time lol why not say ..mum must not  stop father having contact on his allocated days or take him from school to prevent contact.  would have been easier.  wording is very contradicting. but il go by the assumption and what the court lady told me  i.e he must be in my care unless agreed contact and any new order and this supersedes old one.

Its just to scare mum into making sure she does handovers when your son not at school and to stop her going into school on days you meant to have your boy. 

Hi

There are a lot of posts on this forum where the wording of the order is poor and doesn't cover what you need it to or contradicts..

Sometimes you just have to go back to court to revise it which isn't ideal due to time/cost but mothers usually use it to their advantage.. 

well shes breached it anyway 

as my son disclosed the physical abuse on the 8th may. police told me to keep him in my care till told otherwise

i applied for emergency pso and to vary the cao for him to live with me based on the ongoing safeguarding issues. of 3 burns, previously, now the physical abuse of ear pulling/twisting, smacks to face and head regularly. cafcass lady said its excessive chastisement

i applied on 13th. and the social worker rang me to say return him and well do some work with her around behaviour management. i refused as i told her they had not put any safeguarding measures in , she has not shown proof of changing her ways and their is an ongoing repeated history os abuse.

i said i was exercising my pr to sageguard him

he reamined in my care till 25th , but then the social worker didnt like that i didnt comply to her instruictions and told my ex to go and get him early from school on 25th

all contact was stopped since that date including my full week of whitsun holiday 31- 6th

i only found out about the p/s/o on the 15th june as courts didnt send it out and went and got him from school

he is now in my care again. so she broke the p.s.o and kept him 25th may -15th june and if she accuses me of breach then i have a genuine reason i.e to safeguard my son as i felt that the authorites had failed to protect him and the abuse is ongoing and not stopped