DAD.info
Forum - Ask questions. Get answers.
Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:

Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.

Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.

If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help

Cafcass Recommendat...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Cafcass Recommendations not followed by magistrates

 
(@archie43)
New Member Registered

Hi all

I recently attended a Dispute Resolution Appointment to consider a Section 7 Report. The s7 made 2 strong recommendations as the cafcass officer is so concerned at the alienating behaviour of my ex, who has taken our child away and then dragged us through the court system with false allegations of domestic abuse to try and prevent me from being a father. After 18 months I have finally had several observed contact sessions with my child in which no concerns were raised. Instead, the S7 recommended that a Part 25 application for a psychological assessment of my ex be considered by the court, and also that the court appoint a 16.4 guardian for our child (age 20 mths) as their welfare in the care of my ex is such a concern of theirs. Quite a 'brave' position to adopt from the cafcass officer so I was expecting the court to take it seriously. Instead, though, the magistrates in the hearing did not consider either recommendation, stating only that the cafcass recommendations were a bit drastic. I have since received the written court order with no further explanation of why the cafcass recommendations weren't followed. I have lodged notice that I will be making the part 25 application myself, (and as part of this process requesting that a judge consider the 16.4 guardian again) and I have read on solicitor blogs that when the court (magistrates in this case) don't follow cafcass recommendations, they must provide written reasoning for their decision not to. Does anybody know the specific legislation/practice guidance/court rules where this is stated? I need to quote it as part of my application.

Really grateful for any help that can be provided, this case has been one court failing after another, so even after getting a positive verdict from cafcass I am having to fight tooth and nail just to ensure the safety of our child.

Quote
Topic starter Posted : 18/11/2024 1:26 pm
(@dadmod2)
Illustrious Member
Share:

Pin It on Pinterest