DAD.info
Forum - Ask questions. Get answers.
Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:

Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.

Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.

If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help

Advice on Pursuing ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Advice on Pursuing Residency

 
(@lollyrus)
Estimable Member Registered

Hi Guys
Following on from my earlier posts, my Partner has now had his meeting with Cafcass. The Officer was unaware that great contact had already taken place July/August till the Mother blocked contact again and breached the Court Order because she was unhappy contact was to take place in Scotland which she’d agreed to in Court (Mother and Child still live in England). The Cafcass Officer was making all the right sounds when given the background to the case and said she could see that my Partner had the best interests of the child at heart. I’d armed my Partner with video evidence of the contact that had taken place and had documented all his concerns around the Mother’s brainwashing of the child, her hostility, reluctance for contact and obstructive behaviour which the Cafcass Officer was left to peruse over. Whether this helps is another matter!

He disproved all the false allegations raised by the Mother, whilst also stressing his real concerns around the impact all this was having on their Son. He asked for observational contact with their child and the Cafcass Officer thought this was a good idea but would speak to the child first. My Partner stressed that the child would likely claim he didn’t want to see his Father due to the Mother’s brainwashing and asked that Cafcass take that into account. He gave the Cafcass lady a copy of his solicitor’s report which made reference to the Judge stating that he would not be making a “No Contact Order” and that his instructions were that contact was to take place sooner rather than later and the efforts each party made re contact would be taken into account. My Partner said he was willing to do all the travelling in order to see their child as it was more important that contact be reinstated no matter where it was. My Partner told Cafcass that if the Mother continues to be hostile to contact, then he would be pursuing residency.

My question is: My Partner initially was only seeking contact and that was his application to the Court but in view of the Mother’s behaviour and the impact this is having on their Child, he is serious about wanting Residency of the child. How can he do this? Does he have to make it known at the next Court Hearing or does he make some form of Application to the Court?

Any advice would be appreicated.

Quote
Topic starter Posted : 19/01/2015 4:16 pm
(@simon7580)
Honorable Member Registered

Hi,

I think here with you considering asking the court to reverse the residency of the child, there are certain things you will have to prove to the court, ar at least get them to strongly consider.

Of course the ideal scenario in any family breakdown, from the childs perspective, and indeed that of the court is that the resident parent supports and promotes contact between child and non resident parent. Of course in many situations, this does not happen and the resident parent (most often a mother) will disrupt contact. Sometimes it can be to the extent that this behaviour will emotionally harm the child, and indeed abuse their right to a relationship with both parents.

So having said that, if you have:

1 - a wealth of evidence to show that the mother does not promote contact.
2 - a wealth of evidence that shows the mother is cancelling/withholding contact.
3 - evidence that the mother is neagatively influencing the child against the father.

Then of course why not put your case to the court. If it is proving impossible to establish regular contact over a long period of time without the mother derailing it, then why not suggest to the court this course of action.

I would also say it is not just as simple as asking the court for reversal of residence. If it were me doing it, I would back up my arguments and evidence with judgements from previous cases of a similar nature. There are plenty of judgements made by senior judges for reversing residence that you can find online for free. The custody minefield website is one such place that I have spent a lot of time on reading and researching. It's really good.

Simon.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 19/01/2015 6:03 pm
lollyrus and lollyrus reacted
 1626
(@1626)
Noble Member Registered

Simon has given you great advice there.

If you decide to pursue this, procedurally you need to complete a form C2 to add to existing proceedings.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 19/01/2015 6:19 pm
lollyrus and lollyrus reacted
(@lollyrus)
Estimable Member Registered

Thank you both for your replies.

My Partner has lots of evidence of the Mother blocking contact when it suits her. She has done it pretty much for the whole of last year when she was informed about me. The last contact (by telephone) he had with his child was the very day his 'Statement' was served on the Mother (30 October) which highlighted all the concerns Simon has mentioned in his 3 points. We're of the opinion that the Judge has 'sussed' her out and is giving her enough rope to hang herself but one can never tell how its going to go.

If Cafcass suggest to her that she needs to promote contact and she refuses again, then hopefully the Judge will be only too happy to continue with the Enforcement Order my Partner raised and attach a penal notice or change of Residence to it. This might 'buck her ideas up'. However,we think she's of the opinon that she's above the law and her brainwashing of the child will win the day.

We will look into the C2 form and research other similar cases to highlight to the Judge.

Thanks again.

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 19/01/2015 6:47 pm
 Mojo
(@Mojo)
Illustrious Member Registered

As your partners application is for an Enforcement Order then the court already has the option of transferral of residence within the warning notice that was attached to the original Contact Order. I would make the court aware of what you will be asking for, have you been asked for statements yet?

As Simon suggests, look for specific case law where residence has been transferred by Enforcement due to a resident parents implacable hostility and alienation of the child.

I'll ask Coram Childrens Legal Centre to drop by and give some advice.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 20/01/2015 12:41 am
lollyrus and lollyrus reacted
(@lollyrus)
Estimable Member Registered

Hi Mojo

Thanks for your reply.

Yes Statements submitted hence the reason for her stopping contact again as she obviously didn't like what my Partner had written in his which documented her obstructive behaviour, reluctance to contact, the impact her unreasonable actions and negativity was having on their child. Her Statement on the other hand was very hostile, made false allegations about aggression and alcohol abuse against my Partner and complained about her own previous legal team and accused the last Judge of talking down to her! She also tried to submit a piece of evidence that was 7 years old trying to pass it off as recent. She is a teacher too which makes it so unbelievable.

My Partner was planning to ask for a Penal Notice and/or a change of Residency to be attached to the Enforcement if the Judge approves the application but we weren't sure if he had to apply for a change of Residency to add more weight to the original application for a Child Arrangement a Order which originally just sought contact. I'll make sure he makes it known at Court that a change of residency is preferable if her hostility to contact continues.

That would be great if Coram could offer more advice. You have all been very helpful and certainly given us food for thought.

Thanks again everyone.

ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 20/01/2015 1:52 am
 Mojo
(@Mojo)
Illustrious Member Registered

I've asked Coram to drop by and advise, they may take a couple of days to get back to you.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 20/01/2015 1:56 am
lollyrus and lollyrus reacted
(@childrenslegalcentre)
Honorable Member Registered

Thank your for your enquiry.

We advise you to make the judge aware that you wish to change your request to the court from contact to residence. In some instances, the judge will accept this as an informal direction within the court proceedings. In other instances they will require a formal request for directions using the C2 form available from the Family Court or from www.justice.gov.uk.

It is open to the court to order a transfer of residence in “intractable cases” where no contact is taking place as a result of the hostility of one parent. This must be in the child’s best interests and is only as a last resort. The court can also issue a suspended residence arrangement which would only come into force if a particular condition applies, e.g. the mother continues to unjustifiably deny contact.

We advise that you produce submissions centred around the Welfare Checklist, to justify why it would be in the child’s best interests to have a transfer of residence. The Welfare Checklist looks at the following:

• Wishes and feelings of the child (weight given to these feelings depends on the age of the child, more weight being given to a child over the age of 11).
• Childs physical, emotional and educational needs.
• Effect of any change on the child.
• The age, [censored] and background of the child.
• Any harm which the child has suffered or may suffer.
• How capable each parent is of meeting the Childs needs.
You may wish to look for relevant case law on this using the resource on www.familylawweek.co.uk. If you need to discuss this further, please feel free to phone our advice line phone service on 08088020008 which is available Mon-Fri between 8:00-20:00.

ReplyQuote
Posted : 21/01/2015 1:26 pm
lollyrus and lollyrus reacted
Share:

Pin It on Pinterest