Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
Hi All,
I have been arrested a few times due to ex-partner either; making things up, exaggerating or similar. All of which has been; No further action and not guilty.
Is there any case law or similar which makes it plainly clear that the judge cannot deduce adverse inferences from my arrests as I have been arrested 4 times now.
The police officer said I could do something so in my family court the officer questioning me gets called in as a witness to the proceedings. He pretty much apologized to me for being held in a Police cell and quickly released me then they dropped me back off home.
I do not want the judge to look at a piece of paper with Police at the top and being arrested for harassment (NFA) AND make adverse inferences as "high conflict" - what do I do... call in the Police officer?
Hi
Unfortunately there isn't anything that applies to the family courts. In the criminal courts such records are more heavily scrutinised but also any convictions/trial etc would not be impacted by such records as it be excluded (unless relevant and approved by the judge).
I also feel that you need to be mindful of and understand the difference between criminal courts/processes and family courts/ processes and why such police records are important and used. In the criminal courts guilt is based on beyond reasonable doubt, in the family courts its based on the balance of probabilities, so 51%. Therefore just because the police took no further action doesn't mean nothing happened, the police decision (in general cases not necessarily yours) would be based on criminal legislation, whether it would be possible to convict you, the CPS viewpoint etc all based on convicting beyond reasonable doubt, the family courts would look at it and can come to a different conclusion as the bar/threshold is significantly lower but they are not establishing guilt but more what has happened in order to form a viewpoint for the next steps..
Hence it is possible for the police to take no action re domestic violence as they do not have any or enough evidence to pursue and for the CPS to convict but the family court could determine that there was domestic violence just based on the hearing statements from both parties and/or any witnesses and go from there..
The reason this is important to understand is so that your strategy takes this into consideration and you do not just think that just because the police NFA the family courts won't either. You may need to draft statements accordingly or obtain statements (eg from the police officer) or from other witnesses or consider your whole approach. Each situation/case is unique and therefore its impossible to advise specifically..
Hope this helps..
Welcome to the DAD.info forum.
We don’t like to set ‘rules’, but to make sure that you and the other dads are kept safe, we have some requests. When engaging with the forum, please be aware of the following:
- The forum is not moderated 24 hours per day.
- Many of the moderators do so on a voluntary basis. Whilst they may be able to provide some guidance, advice or support, they may not be able to deal with specifics.
- We are not an emergency crisis service so if you or someone else is in immediate danger, please call emergency services.
- If you are concerned about the safety of a child, please click here to find the support you can get for them (link to new page)
- If you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123. They are open 24 hours a day, 7 days per week.
We hope you find this forum a supportive environment and thank you for joining us.