Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: Important Information – open to read:
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
Many thanks to @Will99 for this information - quoting his reply to another post
This link is to a comprehensive document dealing with all different kinds of variation, Chapter 36 deals with diversion of incomee :-
One specific way to divert income is via additional pension contributions - for this specific method there are threshold values in para 36014 which detail what is an 'acceptable' level of pension contribution based on % of income and your age. However note that the age in this table is when you started making pension contributions - and I think this is often misunderstood even by CMS themselves as your current age. In any case I think this table is almost unusable in my view because you may have stopped and started contributions throughout your working life - and para 36012 bullet 7 refers to this as a consideration.
Para 36019 states that the Decision Maker should initially refer to para 36014, but in complex cases (or where either party disputes the decision) the table in para 36020 should be used instead. This is much easier to apply and depends on your current projected pension income and your current income.
Many thanks to @Will99 for this information - quoting his reply to another post
This link is to a comprehensive document dealing with all different kinds of variation, Chapter 36 deals with diversion of incomee :-
One specific way to divert income is via additional pension contributions - for this specific method there are threshold values in para 36014 which detail what is an 'acceptable' level of pension contribution based on % of income and your age. However note that the age in this table is when you started making pension contributions - and I think this is often misunderstood even by CMS themselves as your current age. In any case I think this table is almost unusable in my view because you may have stopped and started contributions throughout your working life - and para 36012 bullet 7 refers to this as a consideration.
Para 36019 states that the Decision Maker should initially refer to para 36014, but in complex cases (or where either party disputes the decision) the table in para 36020 should be used instead. This is much easier to apply and depends on your current projected pension income and your current income.
Just trying to understand this fully - increasing your pension by (example) 12% will mean 12% off your CM payments, however will also mean 12% of your wages are not received and cant be touched until years down the line. So it's just putting it in a different pot not exactly helping with current cost of living.
Or are you saying put the payment back down to a low figure once the calc has been made, then back up again before the annual review
Increasing your pension contributions will do three things :-
1. Increase your pension pot
2. Reduce the net income you get paid
3. Reduce the amount of child maintenance you have to pay
So say you increase your pension contributions by £1,000 in a tax year (compared to the year before, with everything else staying the same).
1. You will have an additional £1,000 in your pension, which is subject to growth hopefully. How this money is taxed later depends as there are different options for accessing your pension pot. Generally speaking it should be taxed less in retirement than if you had had it paid to you through your payroll. For one thing, retirement income is subject to tax but not National Insurance, for another you can also withdraw 25% of your pension pot tax free, and also most people's retirement income will generally be less than their salary when they were working - so this £1,000 could also be taxed at a lower rate than had it been paid to you through your salary.
2. You will receive less in net pay as a result of the extra pension contribution. For a basis rate taxpayer you will get £680 less (£1000 less tax at 20% and NI at 12%) and for a higher rate taxpayer you will get £480 less (£1000 less tax at 40% and NI at 12 %).
For those reasons alone many people decide to increase their pension contributions, but where you pay child maintenance, you will also see a reduction in this.
3. Say your CM is calculated as 12% of your gross taxable income. If you reduce that gross income by £1000 via an additional pension contribution, your CM liability is reduced by £120.
But in respect of 3. there are limits on how much you can pay in to your pension and have that sum reduce your CM. The CMS are aware that some NRPs will do this just to reduce their CM liability, and if they think you are paying an excessive amount in to your pension, they can apply a 'diversion of income' variation which means money so diverted to your pension can also be included in the CM assessment. The variations document deals with this.
Hi - just to add that someone else (apologies I can't recall who, but thank you anyway) posted a link to the 'Child Maintenance Decision Makers Guide', from where you can access the above information relating to variations along with other information :-
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/child-maintenance-decision-makers-guide
edit - it was @world-traveller that posted the above link. Thank you !
Thanks for this, very helpful post!
Hi - Would a holiday lettings property seperate to my home be treated as an asset for notional income?
@trebor01 Most likely, yes. If you were thinking of getting one then budget for it to be considered "additional income" until the child leaves education.
If you bought the holiday letting with income which (you can prove) has already had maintenance paid on it, then you should not be liable for the value of the property itself? But any letting income probably counts as unearned income.
Also expect that if you get an Additional Income variation on your account, it may take years to get it cancelled. Even if you have all the proof.
The system looks to be stacked against the paying parent, and getting worse.
I have explained o pay into a private pension and they haven’t even mentioned this as if nothing effect what they are trying to say I owe?
Welcome to the DAD.info forum.
We don’t like to set ‘rules’, but to make sure that you and the other dads are kept safe, we have some requests. When engaging with the forum, please be aware of the following:
- The forum is not moderated 24 hours per day.
- Many of the moderators do so on a voluntary basis. Whilst they may be able to provide some guidance, advice or support, they may not be able to deal with specifics.
- We are not an emergency crisis service so if you or someone else is in immediate danger, please call emergency services.
- If you are concerned about the safety of a child, please click here to find the support you can get for them (link to new page)
- If you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123. They are open 24 hours a day, 7 days per week.
We hope you find this forum a supportive environment and thank you for joining us.